?

I some times fail to under stand what is wrong with us,we ignore the immediate sick next door friend but supply medicine to Bangladesh,we pay and watch cricketers fight  for money and ignore our maid servants raise,and now we become all concern about The Present West Bengal Governments move to include few news paper according to the way they think better,and ignore that some people has prophesed that this July the world willend.Well in that event the democracy will exist and so will we.It hardly matters what is kept in the liabries by the government for the readers.For the readers in turn it matters what is the market rate of a kilo of potato rather than what is being writen in the news papers.

What the social democrats in West Bengal gradually introduced, the trinomool government wants it at once, politicisation of every thing. The parliamentary democratic system gives priority to the intention of the political party that assumes power, as a result emphasis on the ideology the Political party which rules the subjects takes the front seat,  and such intention of the political party is exerted by a  chosen few,  making  them audible, based on whose wish the wheels of  the regime runs.

There in nothing wrong in such approach, but the problem is when the reign comes to the hand of one instead of a group and more so over in the hand of some one whose mind is preoccupied with vengeance and hatred.

If we travel back to the era of the dictators, Hitler, Mussolini etc all of them had a thing in common, a heart full fire,  enough to burn the communities they disliked. It’s true what happened a century back has been an eye opener for all, the history of Second World War taught us that he who holds the sword of hatred   will perish with the sword. But still some love to defy these teachings and try putting new words in it.

The basic trend of Parliamentary democratic system is that the people choose representatives and the representatives in turn choose there leader, it is the cardinal duty vested upon such representative to choose a leader who will  know  where the lines have to be drawn,   in turn must know what are his/her own limitations and must not leave a lose string hanging from the cloak of governance for the opposition to toy with.

The circular issued by the present government, declaring that decision has been made  to include some newspapers in the list for the aided liberties, there by banning the others are sure to be a blatant attempt to cross the lines and limits that was to be drawn by the democratic regime, in way of distinguishing  them from an autocratic one .

Things are so common when we trace history back words, if one recalls the rule of Hitler, each and every such report, which positively and negatively criticised the Government/regime came under scanner and as such writers often ended there life at a concentrating camp, and in a gradual elapse of time barring a few most of such names were erased from our memory.

Life is the best treasure a human being has, and all of them who rose against the dictators put it forward but in present scenario when State as assumed tremendous power and mechanism  who wants to waste such a valuable object in the hands of a mindless fool.

It is unwise to resist such move as mentioned above , as history taught us these tyrants  exit sooner or later, more over  what is done by the Government is absolutely correct in the present political system , as in parliamentary democratic system it is obvious the business houses those who promote the Political Party which runs the government, will get some political favour and the recent step to introduce  some new news paper in the libraries  is the due  political favour that such news papers should receive from the political party at present running the state  in way of discharging  their  pre poll obligations.

The making of our nation and the so-called partition of our nation also rested on the wish of the business houses, so nothing new has been done by the successors in interest by granting extra favour to chosen few.

It is obvious  that the huge political expenses borne by the political party comes from  the business houses,  and it is appreciated  as a duty of discharging   obligation the political parties favour these business houses or there  representatives who are given good mileage, either by sending them to Parliament or by including them in the lucrative governmental businesses.

In certain cases tender are floated with conditions to accommodate the business houses who blindly follow the regime, In certain cases even policy decision of the Government change stands to get such situation favourable for the disciple, in way of sparing the beneficiary from the Axe of Judicial review.

What ever has happened so far and what ought to happen is obvious and raising voice in such innocuous occasion is a waste of potential energy, which can be reserved for protesting the Governmental move, which may follow sooner or later, for selecting what to eat and cook.

.